Monday, 14 October 2013

go with the flow

The techniques of the DOGME school from Scott Thornbury are very attractive, because it's all about the student:

Teaching should be done using only the resources that teachers and students bring to the classroom - i.e. themselves - and whatever happens to be in the classroom.
A Dogma for EFL

Dogme language teaching is considered to be both a methodology and a movement.[1] Dogme is a communicative approach to language teaching that encourages teaching without published textbooks and focuses instead on conversational communication among learners and teacher. It has its roots in an article by the language education author, Scott Thornbury.[2] 
Dogme language teaching - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But what about listening to the students and see where they'd like the lesson to go?

Example One:
> I suggested to my class that, in order to get to know each other, they should write down any 'not too boring' getting-to-know-you questions (What was the last book you read which you really enjoyed? How long have you been learning English) and put them into a box. Students would then pull out a question and answer it (and it could be one of their own).
> I asked the students if they wanted to do this in pairs (to 'maximize' speaking opportunities) or to do the exercise as a full class (to listen to everyone's answers and to contribute to the to-and-fro of discussion) - and the students all voted for the full class practice - their curiosity proving more powerful. We took 90 minutes to do that - and the conversation flowed.

Example Two:
> I wanted to practice last week's vocabulary - which I had put onto bits of paper (in the form of words or phrases that come up in class) and then put them into a box for 'recycling' later.
> So, I asked the students what they'd like to do with the pieces of paper. One student suggested a different take on what I've done before - which is that students working in pairs or threes each take 2 or 3 pieces from the box and then together as a group construct a story.
> This time, we each (including me the teacher) took one piece of vocab from the box only - then took it in turns to tell a story, each following on from the other and having to keep to the story line of the person before. When it came to each person's turn, we took a new piece from the box. We took 90 minutes to do that - and time flew.
.
.
.

immigration part 2

Following on from
Jay Doubleyou: immigration
Jay Doubleyou: social issues
Jay Doubleyou: Identity

Why does this builder employ Lithuanians rather than Brits?



▶ The Day the Immigrants Left, Part-4/6 - YouTube

How would you feel if a Portuguese guy took your British colleague's job?
Or would you work in an Indian restaurant?



▶ The Day the Immigrants Left, Part-3/6 - YouTube

But what's actually available at the Job Centre?
Should local employers be employing local people?



▶ The Day the Immigrants Left, Part-5/6 - YouTube

And here is Evan Davis in Swindon:



▶ Prof Dustmann on BBC News, interviewed by Evan Davis on the effects of immigration, 6th July 2006 - YouTube
.
.
.

the present perfect with goldilocks and the three bears

What do Daddy and Mummy Bear say when they look at their bowls of porridge/
And why does Baby Bear say something different when he looks at his?



Goldilocks and the Three Bears.mp4 - YouTube

Although perhaps this 'politically-correct' version has more to say...

Goldilocks and the Three Bears
(A Fairy Tale for the Politically Correct)
By Annie Buller

Once upon time, there was a little girl named Goldilocks.  She liked to play in the woods.  One day Goldilocks was playing in a part of the forest that she had never been in before and she was getting very hungry.  She noticed a cute little cottage between the trees and decided to go and ask for a snack.

She knocked at the door, but there was no answer.  When she tried the doorknob, however, she discovered that the door was unlocked and pushed it open.  “This is very unsafe,” she said to herself, forgetting that she was glad it was unlocked.  “My house is never unlocked when there’s no one home.”

Goldilocks went inside and saw three bowls of porridge on the table in the kitchen.  They looked delicious.  She tasted the first one, but it was so hot that she burned her mouth.  She tasted the second one, but it was so cold that it sent electric shocks down her cavity fillings.  Then she tasted the third one and it was just right.  So she ate the whole bowl.  “I wonder whose house this is,” she said to herself.  “They make great porridge.”

With her full stomach, Goldilocks began searching for a place to sit down.  She found three chairs in the living room.  She sat in the first one, but it was too hard.  She sat in the second one, but it was too soft.  She sat in the third one, and it was just right until she realized that she was too heavy for it.  By that time, though, it was already too late and she had broken through the chair and landed on the floor.  “This house could use a few renovations,” she thought.

She decided to go upstairs and look for a bed.  All at once, she had a horrible thought.  “What if they’re upstairs?”  She called out, “Is anyone home?”  There was no answer.

Goldilocks found the bedroom, and after trying all of the beds, (too hard, too soft, just right) she fell fast asleep.  An hour later she awoke only to find three brown fuzzy bear faces looking sternly down at her.  “This must be the one,” growled the biggest one.  They looked at each other and nodded, then as if on cue, they roared as loud as they could.  Goldilocks bolted out of bed and raced out of the house.

The next morning, there was a knock at the door.  Papa Bear opened it to find Goldilocks on his step with a strange man in a suit and carrying a briefcase.  “Who are you?” asked Papa Bear.

“The name is S. F. H. Scunque, attorney-at-law.  Here’s my card.  I’m here on behalf of Goldilocks.  She has asked me to represent her in a lawsuit on the grounds of personal injury, harassment, and emotional duress.  Here are your papers.”

The lawyer left with Goldilocks.  The bears went back inside to call their own lawyer.  They filed a counter lawsuit on the grounds of trespassing and destruction of private property. 

After a few months, when the flurry of paperwork flying between the two attorney’s offices had settled, they all met in court.  Goldilocks was wearing a bandage on her tongue where she had burned it on the porridge, a back-brace (she had jarred her back falling through the chair), and she had one ankle wrapped from spraining it while she ran away.  The bears’ charges did not hold up in court, unfortunately, because they had not had a “No Trespassing” sign on their property at the time, and also because a state certified psychologist had stated that Goldilock’s actions were merely responses to traumatic events she had gone through as a child. 

It had the makings of a successful frivolous lawsuit until the bears brought in their own psychologist who declared Goldilocks to be insane on the grounds that she liked porridge.  (What kind of child likes porridge?)  Then the judge found Goldilocks in contempt of court for lying under oath.  (No one with a burned tongue has to wear a bandage after a few months of recovery time.)  He found in favor of the bears, although their lawsuit had been dropped and no one received any compensation.  Goldilocks appealed with a new count of unsafe living premises against the bears.  The county and state building inspectors were sent to the bears’ house where they inspected it and declared it safe by state and county standards.  (Although they did confiscate the broken chair as a health hazard.) 

When the dust had finally settled, the bears were happy (except for baby bear who didn’t have a chair anymore), the lawyers were very happy, and Goldilocks was forced to use her college savings to pay off court expenses.
Goldilocks and the Three Bears by whimsicalfaery on deviantART
Politically Correct Bedtime Stories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.
.
.

Thursday, 10 October 2013

my favourite tv

What are you watching at the moment?



The Wrong Mans: Episode 1 Trailer - BBC Two - YouTube

What's the most popular comedy series ever on British TV?



Skyscream2 and Gymm0's Top 20 Fawlty Towers Moments Part 3.wmv - YouTube

In a list drawn up by the British Film Institute in 2000, voted by industry professionals, Fawlty Towers was named the best British television series of all time.[1]
Fawlty Towers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can simply watching TV help you learn English?

How helpful is watching TV/movies for learning a foreign language?
6 Tips for Learning a New Language - Wanderlust and Lipstick - Wanderlust and Lipstick
Can TV can help you learn another language? | Literacy, Languages and Leadership
techniques - Is it possible to learn foreign languages effectively by watching tv series? - Personal Productivity Stack Exchange

Why You Will Never Learn a Foreign Language from TV

By , 3/22/2011 at 12:59 pm
The prevailing wisdom seems to be that one of the best ways to get started learning a foreign language is to watch TV or movies in that language.  “If you just keep watching,” say many language wonks, then you’ll eventually start to “pick it up.”  This can’t be further from the truth.
Listening to entire conversations or plots in a foreign language, without having some significant language skills as a base, fails to provide an anchor for your learning.  The result is hearing a string of gibberish from which little or no actual learning takes place.  To achieve real learning, according to Krashen’s “Input Hypothesis”, the learner must be incrementally exposed to phrases that are just beyond her level of comprehension.  (Krashen defines this concept as k+ 1.)  This is the equivalent of hearing a sentence in which all words or grammatical concepts are familiar except for just one.
In other words, unless you are watching foreign language cartoons directed at 2 year-olds, chances are that your random TV sessions are not exposing you to the language nearly as incrementally as your brain needs it.
Why You Will Never Learn a Foreign Language from TV | The Brainscape Blog: Learn How to Learn Faster
.
.
.

the british class system

Do you know this TV series?



Upstairs Downstairs-Series 1-Episode 4 (The Path Of Duty) - YouTube

But you must know this one:



Downton Abbey Series 4 trailer, ITV - YouTube


Does a narrow social elite run the country?

Eton pupil
BBC News - Does a narrow social elite run the country?
Eton eternal: How one school came to dominate public life


The Eton irrelevance



“ARROGANT posh boys”.

Politics and class: The Eton irrelevance | The Economist
.
.
.