Monday, 30 September 2019

open cities

What are 'open cities' (and we don't mean the game...):
Open Cities Africa
Open City | London's architecture education organisation » Open City
OPENCities - Wikipedia
refugee open cities
Smart cities are decades away: but open cities are within reach – The ODI
OpenCity

To what extent is your city 'open'?

Here's an example:
Jay Doubleyou: open cities: gdansk

And another:


Major Mayors of Europe – Bart Somers

He has been mayor of Mechelen since 2001, minister-president of Flanders and MP in the national and regional parliaments – he is Bart Somers

Island of tolerance in ocean of distrust
Mechelen is by far one of the most diverse places in Europe. The city is home to over 120 nationalities, representing numerous religions and thanks to the efforts of its mayor, it has become a beacon of hope that different societies can work together for the common good. The first large number of non-european migrants arrived in Mechelen in 1968, mainly from Morocco. Their descendants represent around 16% of the city’s total population. Nearly 20% of the citizens of the Flemish city identify as Muslim. Yet, despite far-right politicians claiming that migrants are here to destroy our way of life, nothing of the sort has happened in Mechelen.
If you ask Bart Somers on how he approaches the topic of migrants, he will answer that there are no migrants in Mechelen – instead everyone is first and foremost a citizen of the city, who is unique and completely different from everybody else. This individualistic approach has allowed the mayor to cement Mechelen’s place in world rankings as one of the most tolerant and open cities in the world. His success in the matter is further exemplified by the sheer numbers of Muslims that left to fight for ISIS in 2015. That number was zero. Despite the fact that Belgian muslims were on average more prone to leave the country to fight in Syria.
Mechelen was also the only city in Belgium which specifically asked for permission to house Syrian refugees and the mayor’s team developed an in-depth programme of integrating them in Belgian society – including language lessons, cultural and societal courses etc. He believes that while some citizens were opposed to the idea at first, by working and helping the refugees, residents of Mechelen learned to overcome their fears and prejudices and in the end welcomed everyone fleeing the horrors of war.
Major Mayors of Europe – Bart Somers | TheMayor EU

Here's an interesting bit of text:

The Open City 

Richard Sennett 

The cities everyone wants to live in should be clean and safe, possess efficient public services, be supported by a dynamic economy, provide cultural stimulation, and also do their best to heal society's divisions of race, class, and ethnicity. These are not the cities we live in. 

Cities fail on all these counts due to government policies, irreparable social ills, and economic forces beyond local control. The city is not its own master. Still, something has gone wrong, radically wrong, in our conception of what a city itself should be. Perhaps those nice words -- clean, safe, efficient, dynamic – are not enough in themselves to confront critically our masters...

Microsoft Word - The Open City.docx

Here's the talk:



(1) Open City | Lecture by sociologist Richard Sennett - YouTube
.
.
.

art and nature

BBC Radio 4's longstanding series looks at how humans have interacted with the natural world:
BBC Radio 4 - Natural Histories

A new series has looked at artistic and natural artefacts and how they
BBC Radio 4 - The Art of Innovation

A couple of episodes:

Sir Ian Blatchford and Dr Tilly Blyth on challenges by Romantic artists and naturalists to grapple with cloud patterns, from Constable's fine art to a new science of meteorology

BBC Radio 4 - The Art of Innovation, Masters of Spectacle

Sir Ian Blatchford and Dr Tilly Blyth focus on the drama captured in de Loutherbourg's Coalbrookdale by Night, which shaped early impressions of Britain's Industrial Revolution

BBC Radio 4 - The Art of Innovation, Observing the Air

With a little more here:
https://futurecity.co.uk/portfolio/a-cloud-index/


This is from the Science Museum:

Together, art and science help us to interpret, study and explore the world around us.
Examining this ongoing relationship, The Art of Innovation: From Enlightenment to Dark Matter looks at the interaction between scientific progress and social change, how machinery has both influenced and threatened the human body and how tools that go beyond human senses can capture the unseen.
See iconic artworks, including works by Hepworth, Hockney, Lowry, Constable, Boccioni, Turner and contemporary artists Cornelia Parker and Conrad Shawcross.
The exhibition brings together loans from Tate, National Gallery, V&A, National Museums Scotland, the Estorick Collection and more alongside rarely displayed objects from the Science Museum Group’s Collection. Through four sections and twenty stories, discover how we have questioned our relationship with society, our bodies, the environment and found patterns in nature, as we continue to interpret and explore the world around us.
Book now to discover these fascinating stories through textiles, film, photography, paintings, sculptures, models and scientific objects.

Header image: Coalbrookdale by Night, Philippe-Jacques de Loutherbourg, 1801 (Science Museum Group Collection) 


The Art of Innovation
.
.
.

Saturday, 28 September 2019

the church of the flying spaghetti monster

Important information:

Pirates and global warming

chart showing that in 1820 there were 25,000 pirates and the global average temperature was 14.2 degrees C, while in 2000 there were 17 pirates and the global average temperature was 15.9 degrees C.
misleading graph that is claimed to correlate the number of pirates with global temperature
According to Pastafarian beliefs, pirates are "absolute divine beings" and the original Pastafarians.[10] Furthermore, Pastafarians believe that the concept of pirates as "thieves and outcasts" is misinformation spread by Christian theologians in the Middle Ages and by Hare Krishnas. Instead, Pastafarians believe that they were "peace-loving explorers and spreaders of good will" who distributed candy to small children, adding that modern pirates are in no way similar to "the fun-loving buccaneers from history". In addition, Pastafarians believe that ghost pirates are responsible for all of the mysteriously lost ships and planes of the Bermuda Triangle. Pastafarians are among those who celebrate International Talk Like a Pirate Day on September 19.[41]
The inclusion of pirates in Pastafarianism was part of Henderson's original letter to the Kansas State Board of Education, in an effort to illustrate that correlation does not imply causation.[42] Henderson presented the argument that "global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking numbers of pirates since the 1800s".[10] A deliberately misleading graph accompanying the letter (with numbers humorously disordered on the x-axis) shows that as the number of pirates decreased, global temperatures increased. This parodies the suggestion from some religious groups that the high numbers of disasters, famines, and wars in the world is due to the lack of respect and worship toward their deity. In 2008, Henderson interpreted the growing pirate activities at the Gulf of Aden as additional support, pointing out that Somalia has "the highest number of pirates and the lowest carbon emissions of any country".[43]

Flying Spaghetti Monster - Wikipedia

Is this a parody?

Image result for Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

From a couple of weeks ago:
Documentary follows Pastafarians as they strain for recognition | World news | The Guardian
I, Pastafari Documentary Film Fund | Indiegogo
I, Pastafari: A Flying Spaghetti Monster Story (Documentary Trailer 2019) on Vimeo
.
.
.

open cities: gdansk

How mono-ethnic is Poland?

The tradition of a mono-ethnic Poland is relatively new, and it has two main contributors—Hitler and Stalin...
Turning Muslims Away, Poland Welcomes Ukrainians - WSJ

Interwar Poland was a multiethnic state despite the official rhetoric promoting its image to be that of a monoethnic nation-state. According to the 1931 census, national minorities accounted for thirty-one per cent of Poland’s population of thirty-two million (that is, almost ten million). However, a recent reassessment of this apparently massaged number sets the figure at 35.4 per cent (that is, over eleven million) (ChaÅ‚upczak, 1998: 22; Tomaszewski, 1985: 31-51). In a nutshell, ethnic Poles constituted two-thirds of the population while the national minorities – the remaining one-third.
Kamusella: Polish Minorities

Looking at today:
Poland's Hidden MulticulturalismThe conspiracy theorists who have taken over Poland | Christian Davies | World news | The Guardian
Opinion | Poland Digs Itself a Memory Hole - The New York Times

And there's been a big bust-up in Gdansk:
Open House in Gdansk

After the killing of its mayor:
The murder of Gdansk mayor PaweÅ‚ Adamowicz reflects Poland’s increasingly toxic political climate
‘We feel orphaned’: Polish city mourns PaweÅ‚ Adamowicz | World news | The Guardian
2019 Foretells Political and Social Turmoil in Poland | Jewish Culture | Hamodia

Much of this has to do with how we remember our history:
Charlottesville: The ideological battle dividing the world is perfectly illustrated by this fight over a Polish museum — Quartz

And it's very much in the news now:
The populist rewriting of Polish history is a warning to us all | Estera Flieger | Opinion | The Guardian

As are other museums:
Poland's Ministry of Culture Again Accused of Trying to Control Progressive Institution
Poland’s Ruling Party Puts an Extraordinary Museum of Polish-Jewish History Into Limbo | The New Yorker

Within the context of remembering the outbreak of the last war:
WW2 commemorations expose differences at heart of Europe | World news | The Guardian

It's a beautiful, open city:



Google Image Result for https://s.iha.com/00113741246/Gdansk-Architecture-of-old-town.jpeg



File:Gdańsk kamienice przy Długim Targu.jpg - Wikimedia Commons



Gdansk Waterfront | Gdansk Poland - 09/12/2017 | Charlie Jackson ...
.
.
.

the great divergence

THE FOUR GREAT INVENTIONS:
Four Great Inventions - Wikipedia
(1) The 4 Great Inventions that changed the world (China) - YouTube

There were more, as these videos show:
Made In China: Chinese Inventions That Changed the World

And yet a big question for our times - and one which has been asked for the last centuries - is how 'The West' came out on top:
Jay Doubleyou: is the west better than the rest?
Niall Ferguson: The 6 killer apps of prosperity | TED Talk

Although now the question is whether that predominance is being lost - with panic over 'slipping education standards':
Jay Doubleyou: the purpose of education: from china to prussia to the united states
Martin Jacques: Understanding the rise of China | TED Talk

It gets interesting...

EUROCENTRISM:
Eurocentrism - Wikipedia
Amazon.com: Eight Eurocentric Historians (9781572305915): J.M. Blaut, James M. Blaut: Books
What is Living and What is Dead In Eurocentrism?

When and why did the West gain its current economic advantage over the rest of the world? This topic is the source of an animated debate within the academy today. Jack Goody, a noted social anthropologist, analyzes these questions and offers his own views in his new book, Capitalism and Modernity: The Great Debate.

The participants in this debate often have been divided into two broad camps. On the one side, which I will call here the Europeanists, are those who consider the West's attainment of economic advantage as having been the result of fundamental societal advantages, generally institutional or cultural. Factors often cited include limited power of the state, respect for property rights, the spirit of individuality, positive attitudes toward wealth accumulation, and separation of scientific and technical advances from religious control. According to this group, the bifurcation between the East and the West occurred early—at least before 1700 and in some ways centuries before that. While Goody identifies many authors within this group—including [End Page 497] Douglas North, Robert Thomas, and Eric Jones—he cites David Landes and his book The Wealth and Poverty of Nations as representative of this position.

The opposing group, which Jack Goldstone has called the "California School," explicitly rejects the assertion of what they would term "cultural superiority" by the Europeanists, characterizing it as overly broad, Eurocentric, and built on faulty assumptions about both the West and the rest of the world. Goody cites J. M. Blaut, Andre Gunder Frank, and Kenneth Pomeranz as exemplifying this group. Their position is that any specific assertions of European cultural advantage can be disproved by examining individual cases, and that the economic advantage gained by the West either can never be shown to have specific causes or was caused by narrower, more technical explanations. Two examples of this latter type of explanation are bullion flows to Europe (Blaut and Frank) and the ready accessibility of coal and iron in Britain (Pomeranz). Consistent with these views, this group argues that the bifurcation between the West and the East occurred later (after 1750 or even 1800) and took place in a world economy where China was a major, possibly dominant player.

Project MUSE - Capitalism and Modernity: The Great Debate (review)
The Theft of History (Canto Classics): Jack Goody: 9781107683556: Amazon.com: Books

THE GREAT DIVERGENCE:



Great Divergence - Wikipedia
The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy.: Kenneth Pomeranz: 9780691090108: Amazon.com: Books
On the Rise of the West:Researching Kenneth Pomeranz’sGreat DivergenceRICARDO DUCHESNE
Ten Years of Debate on the Origins of the Great Divergence | Reviews in History
Communication and Empire: Chinese Empires in Comparative Perspective

Some more videos:
(1) Kenneth Pomeranz on writing The Great Divergence - YouTube
The Great Divergence on Vimeo

MING DYNASTY:

It would seem that none of the conventional explanations tells us in convincing fashion why technical progress was absent in the Chinese economy during a period that was, on the whole, one of prosperity and expansion. Almost every element usually regarded by historians as a major contributory cause to the Industrial Revolution in north-western Europe was also present in China. There had even been a revolution in the relations between social classes, at least in the countryside; but this had had no important effect on the techniques of production. Only Galilean-Newtonian science was missing; but in the short run this was not important. Had the Chinese possessed, or developed, the seventeenth-century European mania for tinkering and improving, they could easily have made an efficient spinning machine out of the primitive model described by Wang Chen. A steam engine would have been more difficult; but it should not have posed insuperable difficulties to a people who had been building double-acting piston flame-throwers in the Sung dynasty. The crucial point is that nobody tried. In most fields, agriculture being the chief exception, Chinese technology stopped progressing well before the point at which a lack of scientific knowledge had become a serious obstacle. 

Why indeed? Sinologists have put forward several partial explanations. Those that I find most persuasive are the following. 

First, China lacked a free market and institutionalized property rights. The Chinese state was always stepping in to interfere with private enterprise—to take over certain activities, to prohibit and inhibit others, to manipulate prices, to exact bribes. At various times the government was motivated by a desire to reserve labor to agriculture or to control important resources (salt and iron, for example); by an appetite for revenue (the story of the goose that laid the golden eggs is a leitmotif of Chinese history); by fear and disapproval of self-enrichment, except by officials, giving rise in turn to abundant corruption and rent-seeking; and by a distaste for maritime trade, which the Heavenly Kingdom saw as a diversion from imperial concerns, as a divisive force and source of income inequality in the ecumenical empire, and worse yet, as an invitation to exit. This state intervention and interference encountered evasion and resistance; indeed, the very needs of state compelled a certain tolerance for disobedience. Still, the goal, the aim, the ideal was the ineffable stillness of immobility. When in 1368 the new Chinese emperor inaugurated a native (Ming) dynasty to replace the defeated Mongol invaders, he ascended the throne in Nanjing as the Hongwu (“Vast Martial”) emperor. Let not the name deceive the reader: Hongwu’s goal was anything but war. He wanted rather to immobilize the realm. People were to stay put and move only with the permission of the state—at home and abroad. People who went outside China without permission were liable to execution on their return...

Landes 2006 Why Europe and the West JEP.pdf
Why was there no capitalism in early modern China?

Although there are other traditions...
Daoism and Anarchism:  Critiques of State Autonomyin Ancient and Modern China:  John A. Rapp 

See also:
Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology - Wikipedia
Amazon.com: Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology (Paradigm) (8601200454550): David Graeber: Books
Review: “Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology” - Sean Norton - Medium
.
.
.

Monday, 23 September 2019

utopia for realists

There are several established ideas out there:
Jay Doubleyou: pointless work, artificial intelligence and the universal basic income
Jay Doubleyou: the future of work
Jay Doubleyou: the future of work: “capitalism will abolish laundry day” >>> or: “fully automated luxury communism”

A book came out in 2016 which brought these together:

Utopia for Realists: The Case for a Universal Basic Income, Open Borders, and a 15-hour Workweek
It offers a critical proposal that it claims is a practical approach to reconstructing modern society to promote a more productive and equitable life based on three core ideas:

Utopia for Realists: The Case for a Universal Basic Income, Open Borders, and a 15-hour Workweek
Here's a positive review:

Utopia for Realists is an excellent contribution to the politically imperative utopian literature. It deserves to be read alongside Kathi Weeks’ The Problem with Work or Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams’ Inventing the Future. It is fabulously well-researched and engagingly well-written. It’s also extremely accessible.

‘Utopia for Realists?’ - a review | openDemocracy

And here's a not-so-positive review:

Apart from the fact that human needs are infinite, so that today’s predictions of the end of work will prove as awry as those of previous centuries, a universal basic income is no more likely to succeed than communism. Behavioural psychology confirms what even the young Marx, a basic income-for-all sceptic, knew in his bones: we humans believe that reward should follow proportionate effort. It is our just desert. Trying to reconfigure our core hard wiring so we don’t object to anyone anywhere getting a guaranteed income for no better reason than they are alive could only be devised by a fifth columnist anxious to consign liberalism to oblivion. Bregman himself worries in the book – his candour is refreshing – that he could be wrong, but dismisses the anxiety. He was right to be worried.

But his joyful dissection of much of the purposeless work thrown up by modern “bullshit” capitalism hits home. As he argues, too many of today’s jobs are ephemera, creating little or no value and making their holders despair, and if they ceased there would be little or no discernible fall in our living standards. “Work”, in terms of executing a craft or attempting to make the world a better place, is becoming the preserve of too few. How much better if we recognised the fact and opted for leisure? Alternatively, and much more realistically, how about creating more purposed companies and more purposed work? There is more than enough to do.
The third plank of Bregman’s utopia, on top of an impossibilist universal minimum income and an unlikely 15-hour week, is a world of open borders. The best help we can give the poor in the less developed world is to give them unfettered access to our land of plenty, he argues, so they can bootstrap themselves upwards, making both them and us wealthier. I understand that open borders and being welcoming to strangers is a great statement of common humanity – and that immigration is an economic benefit. But no society on earth can welcome unlimited numbers of strangers, keen to enjoy the benefits of whatever civilisation, without having made a contribution to it. Human beings believe that dues should be paid. Far better to manage our borders and let in as many immigrants as we can rather than open them indiscriminately.
Utopia for Realists: And How We Can Get There by Rutger Bregman – review | Books | The Guardian.
.
.

Wednesday, 18 September 2019

Tuesday, 10 September 2019

translate with reverso context

There are some excellent on-line dictionaries:
Jay Doubleyou: on-line dictionaries
Jay Doubleyou: which on-line dictionaries can you use on your smartphone?

This is the latest:

Image result for context.reverso

Reverso Context | Translation in context from English to French

With not only very good examples, but pronunciation of the whole sentence:

Your father was elected chair of Tribal Council.
Tuo padre è stato eletto presidente del Consiglio della Tribù.





chair - Translation into Italian - examples English | Reverso Context
.
.
.

Monday, 9 September 2019

how we should talk to strangers

An interesting writer:
Malcolm Gladwell – Home | Malcolm Gladwell
Malcolm Gladwell - Wikipedia

With an interesting podcast or two:
Revisionist History Podcast

As featured on this blog:
Jay Doubleyou: Search results for gladwell

Here's one of his earlier books:
(1) Outliers: The Story of Success - Malcolm Gladwell Animated Book Review - YouTube

And here's his latest:
Book Review: 'Talking To Strangers,' Malcolm Gladwell : NPR
'Talking to Strangers': Malcom Gladwell's new TED Talk-worthy book - Los Angeles Times




(1) Why we should talk to strangers, according to Malcolm Gladwell | The Economist Podcast - YouTube

He's on BBC Radio 4 every day this week:
BBC Radio 4 - Talking to Strangers, Episode 1
.
.
.

brexit and: "tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis"

Here's an article from the weekend Guardian:
Rise up, rebel, revolt: how the English language betrays class and power | Books | The Guardian

Where someone is holding up a placard...

Here's what Wikepedia has to say: 


Tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis
can be strictly translated as:
"Times are changed; we, too, are changed within them."

Tempora mutantur - Wikipedia

Here's a tweet on the Twitter account of an MP who likes to use Latin a lot:

Image result for tempora mutantur et nos mutamur in illis brexit

Jacob Rees-Mogg on Twitter: "Tempora mutantur, et nos mutamur in illis."

With a little more on the MP:
Jacob Rees-Mogg memes: 27 that are much more interesting than Brexit
.
.
.


the future of the english language after brexit

Where will English be going?
the eu has no plans to downgrade the use of english after brexit
“slowly but surely english is losing importance in europe”

It seems that the language will not be going away very quickly:
As Britain leaves, English on rise in EU — to French horror – POLITICO

But it will no longer be under the control of the Brits:
The English language in the EU after Brexit | VOX, CEPR Policy Portal

The language is certainly changing:
The English language is evolving – here's how it will change after Brexit

Here's the full article from The Conversation:


The English language is evolving – here’s how it will change after Brexit

July 4, 2019 10.50am BST


PhD Candidate in the School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University
Britain is facing an uncertain future and an uneasy relationship with Europe after Brexit. Among other things, the country’s woeful inability to learn languages has been raised as a key stumbling block – with the decline in foreign language learning among school and university students across the UK also raising alarm.
English is one of the official languages of the EU, along with 22 others, and also one of the three working languages of its institutions (with German and French). On top this, English is the most commonly taught foreign language in Europe, which is a major factor in why it is the most commonly used working language. Although not everyone is happy about this, including the French EU ambassador who recently walked out of a meeting on the EU budget when the Council decided to use only English translations.
So, even if Britain leaves the EU, English will remain not only an official language –- because of the member status of Malta and Ireland –- but it will likely also remain the principal working language of the EU institutions.
English is also often used globally as a common language between speakers of different languages. In other words, conversations are happening in English that do not involve native English speakers. This, of course, has a long and fraught colonial past – as the British Empire forced English on its colonies. But the decline of the Empire did not mean the decline of English. On the contrary, as the US rose to be a global economic power, globalisation drove the spread of English across the world – and continues to do so. And the European Union is no exception.

‘EU English’

As part of my ongoing PhD research on the translation profession, I interviewed some British translators working at the European Commission. From their perspective, English will remain the principal working language following Brexit, as switching to only French and German, or adding another language would be unrealistic and require a huge investment in training by the EU. Instead, they report that English will continue to be used, and will simply evolve and change in these settings.
So-called “EU speak” is an example of this. Non-native speakers’ use of English is influenced by their native languages, and can result in different phrasing. For example, within the EU institutions, “training” is often used as a countable noun, meaning you can say: “I’ve had three trainings this week”. In British English, however, it is uncountable, meaning you would probably say something like: “I’ve had three training sessions this week”.
This is a minor linguistic point, but it shows how English is changing within the EU institutions due to the influence of non-native speakers. For the time being, native English speaking translators and editors limit the extent of these changes – particularly in documentation intended for the public.
But if Britain leaves the EU, there will be a dramatically reduced pool of native English speakers to recruit from, because you need to have an EU passport to work in the institutions. As people retire, fewer native speakers will work in the EU, meaning they will have less and less influence on and authority over the use of English in these contexts. This means “EU English” will likely move away from British English at a faster pace.

Englishes and linguistic change

Such change is nothing new – especially with English. “Singlish” or Singaporean English has its roots in colonial rule and has since become independent from British English, integrating grammar and vocabulary from languages that reflect Singapore’s immigrant history – including Malay, Cantonese, Mandarin, and Tamil among others. Singlish has developed its own words and expressions out of this hybrid of languages and has evolved and shifted in response to the migrations of peoples and cultures, new technologies and social change.
Only time will tell whether “EU English” will ever move so far from its moorings. But, according to one translator I spoke to, even if Britain were to stay in the EU, English would continue to change within the institutions:
English doesn’t belong to us anymore as Brits, as native speakers, it belongs to everyone.
And the frequent exposure to and use of English in daily life means other language communities are increasingly gaining a sense of ownership over the language.
The ubiquity of English is sometimes touted as a demonstration of the enduring importance of Britain – and the US – on the world stage. From what I have seen researching translation, this assumption in fact shows how complacent English speaking countries have become.
This does not mean the economic, cultural, and military power of these countries should be dismissed. But this doesn’t change the fact that English is used as a common language in interactions that do not involve any of those countries – take, for example, a Slovenian cyclist being interviewed in English by a French journalist about his performance in the Italian cycling event Giro d’Italia.
Linguistic diversity certainly needs to be championed to ensure we do not lose humanity’s great variety of languages and dialects, and some great work is being done on this. Nevertheless, it is clear that English has developed a role distinct from its native speakers as a shared language that facilitates communication in an increasingly globalised world.

.
.
.